Dilettante's Diary

Feb 1/16

Who Do I Think I Am?
Index: Movies
Index: Writing
Index: Theatre
Index: Music
Index: Exhibitions
Artists' Blogs
Index: TV, Radio and Misc
MAY 27, 2024
Nov 3, 2023
Aug 2, 2023
July 4, 2023
Apr 21, 2023
Feb 10, 2023
Jan 24, 2023
Jan 11, 2023
Dec 2, 2022
July 26, 2022
July 4, 2022
June 2, 2022
March 25, 2022
March 11, 2022
Feb 14, 2022
Nov 19, 2021
Oct 2021
Sept 16, 2021
July 21, 2021
July 15, 2021
June 11, 2021
Apr 23, 2021
March 12, 2021
Feb 13, 2021
Jan 5, 2021
December 2020
Autumn Mysteries 2020
Aug 12/20
May 25/20
Apr 30/20
March 12/20
Dec 6/19
Jan 29/20
Nov 10/19
Oct 24/19
Sept 30/19
Aug 2/19
June 22/19
May 26/19
Apr 22/19
Feb 23/19
Jan 15/19
Dec 20/18
Dec 3/18
Oct 3/18
Sept 9/18
Aug 9/18
July 19/18
June 2/18
May 14/18
Apr 23/18
Feb 22/18
Dec 13/17
Nov 22/17
Nov 3/17
Oct 5/17
Sept 21/17
Aug 3/17
June 16/17
Mar 21/17
Feb 26/17
Feb 9/17
Jan 30/17
Dec 19/16
Dec 11/16
Nov 20/16
Sept 17/2016
Aug 21/16
July 17/16
June 29/16
June 2/16
Apr 23/16
Feb 28/16
Feb 1/16
Jan 27/16
Winter Reading 2016
Dec 15/15
Nov 19/15
Fall Reading 2015
Oct 29/15
Sept 16/15
Sept 4/15
July 29, 2015
July 1, 2015
June 7/15
Summer Reading 2015
May 19/15
Apr 30/15
Apr 19/15
Spring Reading 2015
March 23/15
March 11/15
Winter Reading 2015
Feb 20/15
Feb 8/15
Jan 29/15
Jan 20/15
Highs 'N Lows of 2014
Dec 19/14
Dec 2/14
Nov 10/14
Oct 29/14
Fall Reading 2014
Sept 17/14
Summer Reading 2014
Aug 22/14
Aug 8/14
July 11/14
June 16/14
May 28/14
Apr 30/14
Apr 16/14
Apr 2/14
March 21, 2014
March 13/14
Feb 11/14
Sept 23/13
Favourite Works: 2004-2013
Two Novels by BARBARA PYM
Sabbath's Theater by PHILIP ROTH
July 18/13
Summer Reading 2013
June 19/13
May 30/13
Spring Reading 2013
May 10/13
Apr 18/13
Mar 29/13
March 14, 2013
The Artist Project 2013
Feb 25/13
Winter Reading 2013
Feb 7/13
Jan 22/13
Jan 12/13
A Toast to 2012
Dec 19/12
Dec 16/12
Dec 4/12
Fall Reading 2012
Nov 17/12
Nov 6/12
Art Toronto 2012
Oct 23/12
Oct 4/12
Sept 28/12
Summer Reading 2012
Aug 26/12
Aug 8/12
Toronto Outdoor Art Exhibition 2012
July 14/12
June 28/12
May 27/12
May 20/12
May 4/12
La Traviata: Met's Live HD Version
Apr 21/12
Apr 6/12
Mar 22/12
Mar 9/12
The Artist Project 2012
Academy Awards Show 2012
Feb 26/12
Feb 11/12
Jan 23/12
Jan 15/12
Jan 7/12
Dec 20/11
Dec 12/11
Nov 27/11
Nov 18/11
Nov 7/11
Art Toronto 2011
Oct 22/11
Oct 17/11
Sept 30, 2011
Summer Reading 2011
Aug 11/11
July 28, 2011
July 19/11
TOAE 2011
June 25/11
June 20/11
June 2/11
May 14/11
Apr 29/11
Toronto Art Expo 2011
Apr 11/11
March 24/11
The Artist Project 2011
March 11/11
Feb 23/11
Feb 7/11
Jan 21/11
Jan 17/11
Dec 21/10
Dec 6/10
Nov 11/10
Fall Reading 2010
Oct 22/10
Summer Reading 2010
Aug 9/10
Aug 2/10
TOAE 2010
July 16/10
The Shack
June 27/10
June 3/10
May 5/10
April 17/10
Mar 28/10
Mar 17/10
The Artist Project 2010
Toronto Art Expo 2010
Feb 22/10
Feb 3/10
Notables of '09
Jan 11/10
Dec 31/09
Dec 17/09
How Fiction Works
Nov 24/09
Sex for Saints
Nov 11/09
Oct 22/09
Oct 6/09
Sept 18/09
Aug 23/09
July 31/09
July 17/09
Toronto Outdoor Art Exhibition 2009
Toronto Fringe 2009
Zen Wrapped In Karma Dipped In Chocolate
June 28/09
June 6/09
Myriad Mysteries 2009
May 10/09
CBC Radio -- "The New Two"
April 14/09
March 24/09
Toronto Art Expo '09
March 1/09
The Jesus Sayings
Feb 8/09
Jan 26/09
Jan 10/09
Stand-outs of 2008
Dec 24/08
Dec 4/08
Nov 16/08
Oct 27/08
Oct 16/08
Sept 26/08
Sept 5/08
July 21/08
Toronto Outdoor Art Exhibition 08
July 5/08
June 23/08
June 4/08
May 18/08
May 4/08
April 16/08
March 26/08
Head to Head
Feb 26/08
Feb 13/08
Jan 30/08
Jan 17/08
Notables of 2007
Dec 30/07
Dec 8/07
Nov 22/07
Oct 25/07
Oct 4/07
Sept 18/07
Aug 29/07
Aug 8/07
Summer Mysteries '07
July 20/07
June 28/07
June 8/07
May 21/07
May 2/07
April 14/07
March 23/07
Toronto Art Expo 2007
March 8/07
Feb 16/07
Feb 2/07
Jan 24/07
Notables of 2006
Dec 27/06
December 11/06
November 28/06
Nov 8/06
October 14/06
Sept 22/06
Ring Psycho (Wagner on CBC Radio)
Sept 6/06
August 12/06
July 18/06
June 27/06
June 9/06
May 23/06
Me In Manhattan
May 2/06
April 12/06
March 17/06
March 9/06
Feb 16/06
Feb 1/06
Jan 11/06
Dec 31/05
Dec 12/05
Nov 25/05
Nov 4/05
Oct 24/05
Sept 7/05
Sept 16/05
Sept 1/05
Aug 10/05
July 21/05
Me and the Jays
July 10/05
June 15/05
May 18/05
April 27/05
April 18/05
April 8/05
March 21/05
Feb 28/05
Feb 21/05
Feb 4/05
Jan 28/05
Jan 19/05
Jan 5/05
About Me
Dec 20/04
Dec 5/04
OTHER STUFF: Art Exhibitions, Concerts, etc.

The date that appears above is the date of the most recent reviews. As new reviews are added, the date will change accordingly. The new reviews will appear towards the top of the page and the older ones will move further down. When the page is closed, the items will be archived according to the final date on the page.

Reviewed here: 45 Years (Movie); The Doomsday Invention (Article); Fifty-Seven (Short Fiction); Tissue Gallery (Poem)

45 Years (Movie) adapted from the short story by David Constantine; script by Andrew Haigh; directed by Andrew Haigh; starring Charlotte Rampling, Tom Courtenay; with Geraldine James, David Sibley, Dolly Wells.

Geoff and Kate, who live in a cozy farmhouse in the Norfolk countryside, are preparing a big party for their 45th wedding anniversary this coming Saturday. On Monday, though, Geoff receives a letter telling him that the body of a woman long dead has been found in a mountain crevasse in Switzerland. He and the deceased had been hiking in the mountain when she accidentally fell to her death. Apparently, it’s because of global warming that a thawing glacier has produced her body. And why is Geoff informed of this so many years later? Because he had told the authorities that he was her next of kin; they’d pretended to be married so that they would be allowed to sleep together in European hotels.

This seems like a lot to reveal in a review on Dilettante’s Diary, where we usually try not to disclose any more plot than necessary. However, this backstory comes in the first few scenes of the movie. The point of the piece is not so much what happened on that mountain in the early 1960s, but what it still means to Geoff, if anything, how this affects his relationship with Kate, and how she copes with that. We follow them slowly, day by day through the week as the ramifications of the matter spread like widening ripples across the calm pond of their life together.

This movie seems like the kind of thing I’m supposed to like. It’s quiet, sensitive and deeply felt. It has been getting a lot of enthusiastic response from people, it would seem, who are especially drawn to high-brow movies. Could it be that some of that appreciation has something to do with the fact that folks are pleased to see that actors in late middle-age can get such good roles? It seems to suggest there’s hope for all of us – especially when we see these oldsters having sex (trying to, at least).

But I did not find the movie all that engaging. Worthy and sincere though their story may be, these two people are more than a trifle boring. True, they do give the sense of a loving, affectionate couple who have a long history together, but their life now consists mostly of mundane pottering about: walking the dog, making tea, eating meals, reading, watching tv. The point is made that they don’t have any photos on their walls. That’s partly the result of their not having children, but it’s emblematic of a certain barrenness in their situation. The many shots of the flat, bleak fields of Norfolk seem almost intended as a reflection on Geoff and Kate’s life, as if the filmmakers are falling back on that hoary device known as pathetic fallacy. (That – in case your high school English studies have faded completely from memory – is a writer’s attempt to portray in landscape human-like emotions that seem to echo the feelings of the characters in a story.)

In the midst of all this plain, ordinariness, there is trouble brewing but it’s mostly in Kate’s head. Very little is said about what’s developing. Perhaps, this situation worked better in David Constantine’s short story, where we might have had access to Kate’s thoughts; her angst would have helped to carry us along. In the movie, we have to infer most of it. That puts a tremendous burden on the actress. Ms. Rampling can be charming when she smiles, but her face in repose often looks grumpy, self-pitying. She mopes a lot. The fact that I don’t feel much sympathy for this character could, admittedly, have something to do with the fact that I’m not a wife who is made to feel inadequate by the discovery of a love affair her husband had nearly fifty years ago. Still, I couldn’t help feeling that Kate was over-reacting.

I also had trouble with the fuss about the anniversary party. Many narratives depend on the momentum towards a culminating event: the race, the competition, the fight, the climb. In this case, the upcoming celebration is meant to provide an ironic contrast to the uneasiness in the marriage, but it seems contrived. What couple would throw a swanky black-tie party, speeches and all, to celebrate their forty-fifth anniversary? The explanation given for this big bash is that Geoff and Kate missed a celebration on their fortieth because Geoff was undergoing bypass surgery. Presumably, we’re meant to accept that Kate and Geoff belong to a social group where a huge commemoration is expected for an anniversary as insignificant as a fortieth. Maybe this, again, is something that could have been handled more believably in a short story. It’s harder to buy in a movie where you’re subjected to so much palaver, such dithering about flowers and music, not to mention the eager expectations of friends.

One of them, Lena (Geraldine James), crops up in a couple of scenes. At one point, she and Kate are browsing the offerings in a dress shop and we’re subjected to confab about how differently men and women approach something like an anniversary and how it’s the women who have to show men what’s important in life. Is this something that could have passed by smoothly and without objection in a short story? The scene in the movie made me want to yell at the scriptwriters: stop trying to tell me what I’m supposed to learn here!

The movie does have its good points, though. Those shots of Norfolk fields are beautifully atmospheric. And the movie benefits from some neat editing. One incident has Kate heading out to see if she can find Geoff, who caught a bus into town, leaving a note on the kitchen table. Kate goes into a travel agency and asks whether her husband might have dropped in. The agent asks: "Would he be the man who was asking about Switzerland?" End of scene. That’s all we need.

When Kate finally does confront Geoff, the drama sparks to life and their exchange is gripping. So is Geoff’s speech at the big party. As an actor, Tom Courtenay handles it well in that, as a character, he handles it not very well; he sounds, in his halting delivery of the corny phrases, like somebody who isn’t used to making speeches. And when the final shot of the movie zooms in on Ms. Rampling, you can see why she’s considered such a great movie actress: her face expresses the turmoil of conflicting emotions that sums up what the movie was trying to say all along.


Some New Yorker Notables

The Doomsday Invention (Article) by Raffi Khatchadourian, The New Yorker, November 23, 2015

Time was when I thought every article in The New Yorker was worth reading. If the editors of that august magazine decided that something was important enough to be written about, then I needed to read about it. In recent years, though, there has been a falling off in that sense of urgency about the magazine’s contents. Maybe that’s because of changes at the magazine; maybe because of changes in me.

However, this article by Raffi Khatchadourian strikes me as essential reading for any person interested in where our civilization is heading. It discusses the question of whether or not Artificial Intelligence could outstrip human intelligence and, if so, how soon that might happen and what it will mean for us. Will we be able to ensure that the machines make decisions that are good for humanity?

At risk of simplifying too much – the article delves into an enormous range of problems – one could say that the people most closely involved in the development of A.I. tend to fall into two groups: those who, on the one hand, want to charge ahead as quickly as possible, being limited only by the technical challenges; and, on the other hand, those who take a more philosophical approach, raising serious questions about the ethics of the quest. The main proponent of this school of thought, as expounded in the article, is Nick Bostrom, a philosopher who heads up the Future of Humanity Institute at Oxford University.

It’s frightening to see that A.I. can already trump the human version in so many respects. But I take some comfort from what, if I understand the matter correctly, appears to be a serious limitation of these machines: they don’t yet know how to handle long-range planning, defer rewards and apply learning from one situation to another. Maybe that’s where we humans can hold our own.


Fifty Seven (Short Fiction) by Rachel Kushner, The New Yorker, November 30, 2015

How Ms. Kushner gets inside the mind of this man I do not know, but she gives a chillingly real picture of the way a person can, almost unwittingly, become ensnared in the grip of crime. It starts with a murder that’s more or less accidental, certainly not pre-meditated. And that leads to prison life, where it’s almost impossible for the guy to break free of the gang pressure that controls him.

Part of his problem is that he’s not very intelligent but Ms. Kushner shows that even a guy like him is capable of astonishing observations: "Something else that surprised him was how dull it sounded when you stabbed someone with a shank, how dense and damp. Thud. Thud. Thud. Like trying to run through mud in a dream." And, while being transferred from one prison to another, he notices a pelican take flight from the roof of a building: "He can hear the wings like two garbage bags being shaken open to line a can. Fwap fwap. Fwap fwap fwap fwap." These glimpses into his inner life, almost more than anything else, make you feel that you’re in the presence of a unique human being, and that makes you feel all the more acutely the waste of his life.


Tissue Gallery (Poem) by Loretta Collins Klobah, The New Yorker, November 23, 2015

I don’t often have occasion to comment on the poetry in The New Yorker. (Roughly half of it I can’t understand.) But this one is a knock-out. At the invitation of a doctor, the poet is having a private viewing of foetuses in jars lined up on shelves in a lab. It seems that some of them may have been aborted intentionally; others perhaps were stillborn. The descriptions of the expressions and the postures on these tiny creatures hit the reader like jolts of pain. Whether or not the poet intends to make an anti-abortion statement, I do not know, but I have seldom read anything that speaks so powerfully of the mystery whereby some of us successfully come through the gestation period into full lives on this earth and some don’t. Harrowing.

You can respond to: patrick@dilettantesdiary.com